Subject: [FreeVMS] Re: quick kernel diff and src guide
From: BERTRAND Joël (joel.k.bertrand@free.fr)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 14:27:06 CET
roart@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 01:28:47PM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>
>>roart@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:12:45PM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>roart@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Yes, we should begin with tagging and branching soon.
>>>>>I suppose most of the kernels will be test-tagged; after all, we are at
>>>>>a very early stage.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>if not, the 0.0.1c-pre1 version.
>>>>
>>>The pre and letter versions seems a bit overdone.
>>>Why not plain decimal numbers or hexadecimal numbers? :)
>>>
>>0.0.1b-1 ?
>>
>
> 0.0.2, 3, 4, 5, etc.
No problem.
>>>Will the "0.0.1c" be based on today cvs update?
>>>
>>I will try to merge jbd this afternoon (CET). So the new release can be
>>based on this update. I cannot reboot any stations this afternoon. Is
>>this kernel stable enough to be named 0.0.1c ?
>>
>
> Better have a cvs update again.
> I tried with interrupts again, and it only worked on the first boot.
>
> It is usually stable enough to get to runlevel 3.
> There are some signalling problems: do not do ctrl-c.
I have seen ;-)
I have modified kernel/Makefile and prescript to correctly compile the
kernel directory. I have some trouble with DEVFS_FL_NO_PERSISTENCE (I
have patched a 2.4.17-rc1), and I have patched the tty_io.c file. It
seems to be good. All fixes I have made have been uploaded on the CVS tree.
Regards,
JKB
-- Liste de diffusion FreeVMS Pour se désinscrire : mailto:freevms-request@ml.free.fr?subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Dec 18 2001 - 14:27:10 CET