Subject: [FreeVMS] Re: quick kernel diff and src guide
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 14:04:25 CET
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 01:28:47PM +0100, BERTRAND JoŽl wrote:
> email@example.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:12:45PM +0100, BERTRAND JoŽl wrote:
> >>firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >>>Yes, we should begin with tagging and branching soon.
> >>>I suppose most of the kernels will be test-tagged; after all, we are at
> >>>a very early stage.
> >>if not, the 0.0.1c-pre1 version.
> > The pre and letter versions seems a bit overdone.
> > Why not plain decimal numbers or hexadecimal numbers? :)
> 0.0.1b-1 ?
0.0.2, 3, 4, 5, etc.
> > Will the "0.0.1c" be based on today cvs update?
> I will try to merge jbd this afternoon (CET). So the new release can be
> based on this update. I cannot reboot any stations this afternoon. Is
> this kernel stable enough to be named 0.0.1c ?
Better have a cvs update again.
I tried with interrupts again, and it only worked on the first boot.
It is usually stable enough to get to runlevel 3.
There are some signalling problems: do not do ctrl-c.
-- Liste de diffusion FreeVMS Pour se dťsinscrire : mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Dec 18 2001 - 14:04:40 CET