Subject: [FreeVMS] Re: Plan
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 12:18:36 CET
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:23:54AM +0100, BERTRAND JoŽl wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:45:06PM +0100, BERTRAND JoŽl wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm working on a roadmap, but... How many volunteers are there ?
> >> I propose :
> > Maybe 0.000 instead? Maybe we would need more digits?
> Why not ? ;-)
> I think that we should use the Linux version system :
> - 1st number : major version number ;
> - 2nd number : minor version number (with stable and unstable trees) ;
> - 3rd number : patch level.
> What do you think about ?
Did this start with Linux 1.0?
Even today, an even minor number is not stable unless the patchlevel is high :)
No problem, we will just have an odd minor version number for a long time.
One thing: .s may prove a fs-problem.
Better: Something like freevms-0_0_0.tgz ?
-- Liste de diffusion FreeVMS Pour se dťsinscrire : mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Nov 09 2001 - 12:18:51 CET