Delivery Status Notification

Subject: Delivery Status Notification
postmaster@bouncemessage.net
Date: Tue Oct 16 2001 - 12:09:20 CEST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: BERTRAND Joël: "[FreeVMS] [Fwd: Re: [fmII/contact] Subscription]"
• Previous message: BERTRAND Joël: "[FreeVMS] gMach or Linux kernel ?"

This message could not be delivered to the following recipients:

<magne@trd.clustra.com>:
148.122.208.20 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 relaying mail to trd.clustra.com is not allowed
Giving up.

• Message/Delivery-Status attachment: stored

attached mail follows:

        Hey,

        I have seen that there are many subscribers. So, we can begin to argue
about advantages and disadvantages of three kernel types :
1/
microkernel based on the Hurd-project ;
2/
other microkernel based on gMach ;
3/
Linux kernel.

        I don't have any good experiences with microkernels (Mach kernel in a
mkLinux distribution...), but the first FreeVMS project was based on a
Mach microkernel. I don't know the Hurd project, but I think that both
Mach and Hurd are very similar (warning : Hurd only runs on ia32.).

        The Linux kernel can be used too. I'm looking for the best choice between
gMach and Linux kernel. I'm waiting for your arguments.

        Regards,

        JKB

-- 
Liste de diffusion FreeVMS
Pour se désinscrire : mailto:freevms-request@ml.free.fr?subject=unsubscribe
	
	

• Next message: BERTRAND Joël: "[FreeVMS] [Fwd: Re: [fmII/contact] Subscription]"
• Previous message: BERTRAND Joël: "[FreeVMS] gMach or Linux kernel ?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Oct 25 2001 - 15:42:21 CEST