Subject: [FreeVMS] Re: Release candidate 0.0.2... Some troubles...
From: BERTRAND Joël (joel.k.bertrand@free.fr)
Date: Fri Dec 21 2001 - 14:06:26 CET
roart@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 10:53:17AM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>
>>roart@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 06:14:33PM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Roar, can you compile your kernel, or is it my tree which is broken ?
>>>>
>>>Yes, it compiles.
>>>
>>I'm not sure that we are working on the same sources ;-)
>>init/main.c and linux/include/linux/sched.h on are the CVS tree and I
>>cannot compile init/main.c. If you tree compiles, you have certainly
>>patched some files. If not, I can patch these files.
>>
>>Can you verify if the file versions on the CVS tree is the versions which
>>you use ?
>>
>
> My tree seems ok.
> (All files which have diffs against plain 2.4.16 are in the CVS tree)
I will try to compile a 2.4.16, but I don't believe that this trouble
come from the initial kernel version.
Oops, the CVS tree can patch a 2.4.16 but not a 2.4.17rc1
(2.4.16 + patch rc1 + patch freevms)... Why ? I will work on this
trouble... My old notebook is compiling this new kernel. If it can build
it, I will release a 0.0.2 kernel this afternoon (CET).
Another question... I will go on holliday and I will come back the 2nd or
3rd january (I will read this mailing list, but with a RTC modem...).
What's about the different subprojects ?
Regards,
JKB
-- Liste de diffusion FreeVMS Pour se désinscrire : mailto:freevms-request@ml.free.fr?subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Dec 21 2001 - 14:06:45 CET